Luke 17:2
“It would be better to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around the neck than to face the punishment in store for harming one of these little ones.”
20
Mar
Luke 17:2
“It would be better to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around the neck than to face the punishment in store for harming one of these little ones.”
7
Jan
For those of us who don’t yet believe in the LORD and for those of us who do believe, we should consider these words from Jesus in Matthew 19:25-26 & 20:1-16
25When the disciples heard this, they were greatly astonished and asked, “Who then can be saved?” 26Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
Jesus then told this parable about those who follow him.
1 “For the Kingdom of Heaven is like the owner of an estate who went out early one morning to hire workers for his vineyard. 2 He agreed to pay the normal daily wage and sent them out to work.
3 “At nine o’clock in the morning he was passing through the marketplace and saw some people standing around doing nothing. 4 So he hired them, telling them he would pay them whatever was right at the end of the day. 5 At noon and again around three o’clock he did the same thing. 6 At five o’clock that evening he was in town again and saw some more people standing around. He asked them, ‘Why haven’t you been working today?’
7 “They replied, ‘Because no one hired us.’
“The owner of the estate told them, ‘Then go on out and join the others in my vineyard.’
8 “That evening he told the foreman to call the workers in and pay them, beginning with the last workers first. 9 When those hired at five o’clock were paid, each received a full day’s wage. 10 When those hired earlier came to get their pay, they assumed they would receive more. But they, too, were paid a day’s wage. 11 When they received their pay, they protested, 12 ‘Those people worked only one hour, and yet you’ve paid them just as much as you paid us who worked all day in the scorching heat.’
13 “He answered one of them, ‘Friend, I haven’t been unfair! Didn’t you agree to work all day for the usual wage? 14 Take it and go. I wanted to pay this last worker the same as you. 15 Is it against the law for me to do what I want with my money? Should you be angry because I am kind?’
16 “And so it is, that many who are first now will be last then; and those who are last now will be first then.”
Some come early in the day, some come in the middle of the day, and some come at the very end of the day, but all receive the very generous reward from their Master.
Grandpa did indeed confess Jesus about six months ago, while talking with Dad.
Mt. 12:1-13 God Almighty follows the Spirit of the law not the letter of the law. He is a Lord of mercy. Mt. 12:7 “If you had known what these words mean, ‘I desire mercy not sacrifice,’ you would not have condemned the innocent.”
To conclude this memorial to Homer Martin, we can know that
1) He was tough & yet gentle like Jesus
2) He was just, yet merciful like Jesus
3) He showed his love by his actions, like Jesus.
4) And finally he confessed his faith that Jesus is Lord.
31
Dec
(PART 5, FOR ‘WHAT D.S. MARTIN BELIEVES’)
Ah! There you are. I was afraid I might have lost you at the bottom of that last posting.
I am glad that you’ve made it up here to find my conclusion of the remarks about Romans 1:19-20.
It is not a mystery, that throughout all human record and across cultures, God is seen in human religion and ritual.
If God appeared only in a handful of cultures, and “his” philosophical origins could be traced to an aeon and locale, then I might be troubled by the possibility of MAN creating god.
But, as it is clearly known, the knowledge of God is universal in the human psyche, if not hard coded in our DNA.
Paul makes this argument by stating about mankind, “God has put this knowledge in their hearts.”
Paul states also that we “can clearly see his invisible qualities…” What qualities might one see if he looks at the earth and sky?
If I were to consider for just a few more moments, what “invisible qualities” Paul might expect for me to see, while I am looking high and low, I might…, just maybe…, be able to see God’s personality and character.
And, in those few moments of further contemplation, I think, I would perceive a great deal of reverence, both for and from the God who has built our cosmos.
TO BE CONTINUED…
God bless,
DSM
31
Dec
Look at the Does God Exist? website. Mr. Clayton makes a bold claim that he can scientifically prove that God exists.
I want to get back to my answers to Matt, about what I believe and why I believe. (This is the 3rd or 4th part of this answer series, depending on if and/or how you might be counting the parts.)
What do you think about this photo? Is it beautiful? Peaceful? Graceful?
I say God is majestic!
Some say “nature” is awsome!
Did anyone catch the personification of Nature, in the quote from the Scientist, Russ George? About nuclear fusion within our Sun and all other stars in the universe, Mr. George said “Nature, however, does not seem to use it on a very large scale…”

So, you must understand that Mr. George has simply taken the word “God” and replaced it with the word “Nature.”
Nature is personified and given a personal will.
I don’t know Mr. George’s theology, but this same issue arises with many publicly avowed science atheists.
Therefore, simply replacing the word “God” with some other word does not get rid of God, it rather just gives Him a new title.
It is, ultimately, up to each individual to know ‘what’ he/she really believes and ‘why’ he/she has been convinced of that thing.
We may not want to work out our beliefs because the answer is inconvenient.
This issue happens in the news every week.
The story might go something like this: A mother’s “little Johnny” is caught in a tragic incident on a “joy ride” or with a trunk load of illegal drugs or “You Name It”, and the mother goes on Channel 8 news and tells the reporters that her son is a perfect angel.
We choose to believe or disbelieve for many reasons.
But, truth and lies do not exist without leaving their mark. Often times the mark is clearly present, but the evidence is simply ignored because the required action may be too painful.
It is a failing of the individual to not desire the truth.
And when this happens we make ourselves to be fools, by believing our own made-up lies.
We actually see people who can fabricate lies out of whole cloth and then begin to believe the thing they’ve just made-up. We could laugh, it weren’t so sad. This is the very thing that the Apostle Paul wrote concerning in Romans 1:18ff. Look at the following passage and think about what Paul tells us about God and humankind.
18 But God shows his anger from heaven against all sinful, wicked people who push the truth away from themselves. 19 For the truth about God is known to them instinctively. God has put this knowledge in their hearts. 20 From the time the world was created, people have seen the earth and sky and all that God made. They can clearly see his invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature. So they have no excuse whatsoever for not knowing God.
21 Yes, they knew God, but they wouldn’t worship him as God or even give him thanks. And they began to think up foolish ideas of what God was like. The result was that their minds became dark and confused. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became utter fools instead. 23 And instead of worshiping the glorious, ever-living God, they worshiped idols made to look like mere people, or birds and animals and snakes.
Humans are the same today as they were then, “Wicked people who push the truth away from themselves.”
Pushing truth away about a rebellious and disobedient child will condemn that son or daughter to a life of misery. And yet, we do it.
Pushing truth away about a tire that has a bulge on one side will result in tragic consequences on the highway. And yet we do this too.
Dealing appropriately with either of these two examples will certainly result in personal discomfort, but the alternative is far more lasting and ugly.
My 2nd essay on this subject, posted on December 21 2006, deals with the subject that Paul outlines in the Romans 1 passage above. I made the same point that Paul made. I used specific hard evidence of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, but even non-technological folks from two thousand years ago saw the same truth that remains today.
Please, read Romans 1:19-20 again, and I will meet you up in my next post, to conclude this thought. But, you have got to follow me there.
TO BE CONTINUED…
God bless,
DSM
23
Dec
The title is a variation on the opening for the Apostle Paul’s “Sermon on Mars Hill.”
This post is a sidebar discussion from the last essay posted Thursday December 21. I will pick-up the continuing answer following Christmas.
From that last essay you may now see, that I am not afraid of the “demons” of secularism.
But, I honestly don’t see the proponents of atheism and the religion of Secular Humanism as the enemy. The scriptures are clear that the enemy is Satan, not our fellow men and women. Furthermore, the many other religions of the world should not be viewed as the enemy either. Paul did not see the religious folk of Athens as the enemy, when he gave his “Sermon on Mars Hill”, in Acts 17:16-34. One might say; ‘The passage states, that “While Paul was waiting for them in Athens, he was deeply troubled by all the idols he saw everywhere in the city.” Therefore, we too must display our indignation with false religions and false gods.’
To this I would concur, but the example of Paul’s indignation was not, wrath upon the pagans. But, rather he was extremely patient, because it also says that he spoke daily, to all who would listen. He didn’t insult the people. He sought audiences by appealing to them by common beliefs.
As, my brother-in-law pointed out to me in a discussion just before Christmas, ‘Paul had to take some time and interest in the pagan beliefs and religious/philosophical background’, so that he could reason with them about their shared desire for man’s recognition of the divine.
Paul’s quote is found starting in verse 22;
I do not accept theologians’ arguments that attempt to portray Paul’s efforts in Athens as failed or “not a great success”, because the number of converts listed in verse 34 is minimized to “some” or “others”, while only naming Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman name Damaris. To this point I might note that, the Areopagus was not just another chapter of the local Rotary Club or Kiwanis. To sit on the Council of the Areopagus meant that you had influence. And while we may not have any secular historical information on Damaris, the fact remains that Luke expected that her name would be of interest to the “Most honorable Theophilus”, for whom the account was written. And finally on the point that Paul really missed an opportunity in the way he addressed the scholars in Athens, I would ask the question, what is Paul’s motive anywhere he goes? Generally, his mission is to glorify Jesus, and specifically to share the gospel with those who are prepared to accept Christ.
Did Paul succeed on these two goals? Yes!
What is my purpose for the Theology of Nuance web log?
How should I measure success?
What if 1,000,000 people eventually come to faith in Jesus and follow God’s will, would that be a success for this blog?
Christian Commentator’s would likely say, “That is a successful mission.”
What if 1,000 people eventually come to faith in Jesus and follow God’s will, would that be a success for this blog?
Christian Commentator’s might say, “That’s a successful mission. But, Mr. Martin might have spent more productive time in the field.”
What if only 1 person takes the decision to not give up the wrestling match with God (this is an allusion and link to a comment from a previous post) and they stay faithful, in lieu of falling away?
Christian Commentator’s would likely say, “That is a failed mission.”
But, I would disagree. Because, what is the value of single soul?
Would God have sent Jesus for one soul? My answer is yes!
Therefore, if I am calculating success, using God’s example as my standard.
My guiding one soul brings great “successful” glory to Jesus. Because Jesus left the ninty-nine safe sheep, in order to find the single lost lamb.
The bible is clear that our fellow men and women are “captives” of the devil.
Yes, we must deal forcefully at times with these captives who are working for the enemy.
However, there is never a time when we are seeking to spiritually destroy or abandon these people.
Many of these people will become our closest brothers and sisters in Christ, when they personally see the example of love, which Jesus reveals through us.
We must not reject Muslims, Hindus, Agnostics, Secularists, Humanists, or Atheists. God bless them. God sent His Son to die for them. God died for them. The diciples who follow Him do as He does.
God Bless and Merry Christmas!
DSM