<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Theology of Nuance; Struggling with God and Man and Overcoming &#187; philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/category/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theologyofnuance.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 13:08:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conventional Cynicism vs. Conventional Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2010/07/10/conventional-cynicism-vs-conventional-wisdom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2010/07/10/conventional-cynicism-vs-conventional-wisdom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 19:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D.S. Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cynic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyofnuance.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A dialogue between two great Greek philosophers; Plato &#38; Diogenes the cynic Plato was discoursing on his theory of ideas and, pointing to the cups on the table before him, said while there are many cups in the world, there is only one ‘idea’ of a cup, and this cupness precedes the existence of all [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2010/07/10/conventional-cynicism-vs-conventional-wisdom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Ethos?</title>
		<link>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2010/01/10/why-ethos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2010/01/10/why-ethos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D.S. Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Truth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postmodernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social comment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metaphysical Naturalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nietzsche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontological Naturalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyofnuance.com/?p=755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some questions to be answered, and the theme to the answer may permeate future posts, because, philosophy is seldom isolated to any specific Q&#38;A.  Instead philosophy should be considered holistic thought therapy. Does philosophy have any value to the average person in the real world? Should I care what the professors are professing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2010/01/10/why-ethos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Implied Presumption of Theology</title>
		<link>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2009/09/06/an-implied-presumption-of-theology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2009/09/06/an-implied-presumption-of-theology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D.S. Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyofnuance.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David S. Martin: An Implied Presumption of Theology “Theology becomes relevant when one assumes that he is capable of knowing what God expects from his creation. Humanity is arrogant enough to believe that this knowledge is within our grasp, and so, we cipher with our finite minds; presuming that the infinite mind of God may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2009/09/06/an-implied-presumption-of-theology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu; Chapter 25 Who is &#8220;The Great&#8221; one?</title>
		<link>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-who-is-the-great-one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-who-is-the-great-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D.S. Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[God]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-who-is-the-great-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lao Tzu describes God as &#8220;Tao&#8221; (translated as the &#8220;Way&#8221;). I will further note that Lao Tzu states that Tao may be understood to be &#8220;the Mother of all things&#8221;. And finally, Lao Tzu gives &#8216;Tao&#8217; the name &#8220;The Great&#8221;. This is a profound chapter from the Tao Te Ching. There can be no mistake [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-who-is-the-great-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tao Te Ching by Lao Tzu; Chapter 25 &#8220;The Mother of All Things&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-the-mother-of-all-things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-the-mother-of-all-things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>D.S. Martin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Holy Spirit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[theology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-the-mother-of-all-things/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I note that Lao Tzu describes God as &#8220;Tao&#8221; (translated as the &#8220;Way&#8221;). I further note that Lao Tzu says that Tao could be called &#8220;the Mother of all things&#8221;. And finally, Lao Tzu gives Tao the name &#8220;The Great&#8221;. This is a profound chapter from the Tao Te Ching. Theology geotheology ideology Sphere: Related [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theologyofnuance.com/index.php/2007/11/01/tao-te-ching-by-lao-tzu-chapter-25-the-mother-of-all-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
